Xie Xuren, China’s Minister of Finance, and Zhou Xiaochuan, Governor of the People’s Bank of China, failed to show up at the IMF-WB plenary
session and sent their deputies instead. This is being interpreted as part of
the Chinese government’s retaliation for the Japanese government’s purchase of the
Senkaku Islands that they did not already own from their Japanese owner. I don’t
get it.
This was a purely symbolic act. Unlike the reported
slowdown of customs procedures or the 2010 cutback of rare earth exports, it
had no effect on the real world. It makes no sense to keep the world in the
dark about what your act symbolizes. So what gives? My guess is that Xie and
Zhou were merely protecting their asses.
These two men are technocrats who first
made their mark in the fiscal and financial arenas in the 1990s and kept moving
up. In other words, these are B-list leaders. If you don’t believe me, just look
at the CVs for Xi Jinping, the next Chinese President, and Li Keqiang, the next
Chinese Prime Minister. They never served as state minister. And no, it not a
coincidence; neither did the current occupants of the offices Hu Jintao and Wen
Jiabao.
And now, there’s a massive transition of power
going on in China and this is their chance to max out, say, Xie as State
Council member and Zhou as the next Finance Minister. But the B-list hangers-on
of the A-list people, who concentrate their efforts on the domestic CCP snakes-and-ladders
game for influence and riches, must view these two men of the world with some
suspicion mixed with envy for their global connections. So isn’t it likely that
many of them would have brought their knives out if the pair had shown
themselves at the plenary, where it could have been difficult to avoid engaging
their Japanese counterparts/hosts in a photo-op planned or not? Likewise would they
not have capitalized on the negative worldwide media coverage if the two did show
but subsequently shunned their hosts, injecting undesirable discord to a global
economy at a most difficult crossroads?
I think Xie and Zhou took the safe way out.
And that fits to a T the typical profile of the Chinese leadership as a most
cautious, risk-averse lot.
No comments:
Post a Comment