If
my memory serves me correctly, I got or am getting three more calls right, and
one wrong.
First,
I said that the TPP would move after and only after the U.S. midterm elections
and that a positive outcome in the Japan-U.S. bilateral negotiation would be
dictated by the Japan-Australia FTA deal. It’s certainly looking that way, and
the naysayers are saying that the odds have improved. No they haven’t. They
haven’t changed one bit. Those people think (or say) that they have, because
they’d listened to one too many informed sources who in effect provided the
illusion of action while the two sides jogged in place, ate up too much Japanese
media coverage by reporters canvassing for headlines, or just hated Prime Minister
Abe too much. I’m not saying that it’s a done deal; I know too little of the
political dynamics in the United States to be certain of TPA and (more
crucially) bicameral consent. I’ll leave those calls to experts like Paul
Sracic.
I’ve
been trying to remember what the second one was—it’s been on my mind for
several days now, and now that I’m armed with my Jack Daniels typing this, it
completely escapes my mind—so let’s go straight to the third one, which is..,
I
tweeted that I would be surprised if public opinion in Jordan hadn’t turned
against ISIL already as the result of the murder of the pilot although a good
number of pundits thought that the monarchy would catch the brunt of the criticism.
For now, things appear to be going in my direction. My call was based on my observation
of human nature’s desire for revenge, augmented by a piece of conventional wisdom
that was implanted in me in my preteens about an Arab predilection for eye-for-eye
justice.
I
got the DPJ leadership election doubly wrong, of course, when I called a Hosono
win over Nagatsuma in a runoff. It was a gain for me, though, since I probably would
not have noticed how poorly Natgatsuma did in the party dues-paying rank-and-file
vote. The labor and teachers’ unions, who were supposed to be well-represented there,
turned out to be much smaller or more pragmatic than I’d expected. The DPJ will
be more right-center, at least on foreign policy, than I thought, which,
according to Lully Miura’s analysis, will be a good thing for a true two-party system,
if not for the diehard liberal-left.
Finally
(for now), I did say that the ISIL murders of the two Japanese hostages would
do little to move the needle policy-wise, and I think that Mr. Abe’s denial that
he wants to send troops to the Middle East for logistic support bears this out
in part, but I don’t think that it was the second call that I had in mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment