One
of the great what-ifs of contemporary East Asian history is this: What if the Japanese
public had reacted differently to the Koizumi overtures to North Korea? More specifically,
what if the Japanese public’s response had been measured enough that the prime minister
could negotiate for normalization of bilateral relations? He put a lot of
political capital on that bet and managed to salvage some political dignity when
he extracted the families of the surviving (according to North Korean claims) abductees
with a tiny fraction of the cash that would have been forthcoming in the
process of normalization.
Trolls
in a forum that will go unnamed will argue that right-wingers killed any
chances of following up on the North Korean admission when it insisted on
keeping the families of the abductees in Japan. They will put the blame on
Shinzo Abe, who as Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary argued against returning them
to North Korea. I wonder if these are the same right wingers who, after more
than a decade of steadily worsening relations with China and South Korea managed
to raise 12.4% of the vote for their candidate of choice Toshio Tamogami in a
Tokyo gubernatorial race with a historically low turnout. In any case, the Japanese
public drove the media response, not the other way around, though the calloused
brains of those trolls will never allow them to admit. It is also to be remembered
that the Socialist Party (JSP) and Asahi
Shimbun, who would normally have been expected to be sympathetic to North
Korea, could not speak up on this matter because of their earlier dismissive attitude
towards the existence of abductees (and the possible implication of the JSP in
the liquidation in one of them). If nothing else, there was an extremely high
price to be paid politically if Koizumi had decided to send them back.
The
most significant effect of all this was that it hobbled Japan in the Six Party Talks,
where it became more of a nuisance to the other four, who were trying to
negotiate a deal on the nuclear weapons—not that in hindsight it had been a realistic
goal in the first place. But when and where hasn’t domestic politics dictated
diplomacy? Was it Yogi Berra who said that that diplomacy is domestic politics
by other means?
No comments:
Post a Comment