The
Nov. 14 Mainichi
and Yomiuri
report from Japan and Shanghai respectively that the Chinese authorities are identifying
and calling back the coral poaching boats back to their home provincial ports in
Fujian and Zhejiang. The Yomiuri carries an account of a Nov. 12 Fujian online
news service report that says four poachers have been indicted. Peace dividend
from the Sourpussy
vs. Mr. Whatever photo op in Beijing? Perhaps. What matters to me,
honestly, is that my The
Diplomat post (faulty
link restored) made it online with one day to spare before the media story
broke out and that the media report corroborates three verifiable conjectures of
mine while refuting none of them.
1) “…the
high likelihood of these poachers operating in groups…”
I made this conjecture because of the well-known
propensity of Chinese fishing vessels to work in packs as well as the obvious dangers
of working solo among lawless competitors. Geographical concentration suggests
strongly that this is the case.
2) “The
Chinese authorities know the identities of the detained vessels and their crew
members…”
This was an easy call to make because the
Japanese authorities would obviously be providing ID information to their
Chinese counterparts.
3) “The
poaching will abate fairly soon.”
Actually, I didn’t realize that it was already happening
(the Mainichi reports says that the number of observed vessels peaked on Oct.
30 at 212, declined from there, and dropped significantly to 141 on Nov. 10,
the day of the Abe-Xi meet-and-kinda greet), wand I had qualified my conjecture
with the weasel word “fairly.” But I’m going to let myself off on this one,
with the admonition to take note that the Chinese authorities appear to have a
pretty good handle on their ocean-going vessels that they can wield when it
suits them to do so.
The
last point suggests, though, that one conjecture is likely to be proven wrong,
namely:
…a few vessels
will continue to show up…
I’ve
changed my mind.
Correction:
Yomiuri article appeared on the 13th, the same day as The Diplomat post.
No comments:
Post a Comment